Perspective-based Critiquing: Helping Designers Cope with Conflicts among Design Intentions
نویسندگان
چکیده
Analyses of design activities indicate that conflicts detected at the solution level often originate in conflicts at the design intention level. We have extended previous computational critiquing approaches by helping designers to become aware of, understand, and resolve conflicts among design intentions. A perspective-based critiquing system allows designers to explicitly represent design intentions in terms of perspectives, and critiques design solution forms according to each specified perspective. By attending to the critic messages and associated design rationale, designers become aware of the conflicts among abstract perspectives. We describe two design environments that provide such perspective-based critiquing systems: the KID (Knowing-in-Design) design environment and VDDE (Voice Dialog Design Environment). These design environments use different approaches for representing perspectives and partitioning the knowledge-base. We compare the two approaches and enumerate design guidelines for creating perspective-based critiquing systems.
منابع مشابه
Integrating DFM with CAD through Design Critiquing
The increasing focus on design for manufacturability (DFM) in research in concurrent engineering and engineering design is expanding the scope of traditional design activities in order to identify and eliminate manufacturing problems during the design stage. Manufacturing a product generally involves many different kinds of manufacturing activities, each having different characteristics. A desi...
متن کاملCOMPUTER-AIDED CRITIQUING SYSTEMS Lessons Learned and New Research Directions
A critiquing system helps designers improve their design artifacts by providing feedback. Computer-aided critiquing systems have been built in many fields and provide us with useful lessons. In this paper we analyze existing critiquing systems in terms of (1) critiquing process, (2) critiquing rules, and (3) intervention techniques. Based on this analysis, we suggest new research directions for...
متن کاملEmbedding critics in design environments
Human understanding in design evolves through a process of critiquing existing knowledge and consequently expanding the store of design knowledge. Critiquing is a dialogue in which the interjection of a reasoned opinion about a product or action triggers further reflection on or changes to the artifact being designed. Our work has focused on applying this successful human critiquing paradigm to...
متن کاملDesign Critiquing Systems Jason
Design critiquing systems are a type of intelligent user interface used to support human designers in decision making. This paper places design critics in the larger context of intelligent user interface approaches and surveys several critiquing systems. Each approach and system is evaluated with respect to a five-phase design improvement process. This paper concludes with a summary of the stat...
متن کاملAn Ontology-based Validation Approach to Resolve Conflicts in the Manufacturing Design Process
In design process of manufacturing, designers analyze the factor of phenomena and apply solutions to phenomena (such as resizing, changing electrical circuits, and modification of mass). There may be often conflicts based on chain relations among solutions which designers cannot recognize. We focus on validating these solutions. In this paper, we propose an ontology for representing chain relat...
متن کامل